We just celebrated Christopher Columbus Day or as it’s been refined as Indigenous People Day a couple of weeks ago.
The story goes that the celebration should be more for the Indian’s who Christopher encountered on his first visit to the America’s and for that matter, all indigenous should thus be recognized. Christopher Columbus has been downgraded to a racist, who abused the natives and proposed these people would be ripe for enslavement. Christopher, they say is a very evil person who got lost at sea and accidently found America.
Most of us, who are older than Sponge Bob, have heard the story of Christopher Columbus something like this.
Columbus while I was growing up, was always portrayed as an explorer who journeyed the unexplored reaches of the globe in search for a path to the East Coast of Europe and specifically to establish a new trade route to counter the land Silk Route. Where did this evidence of the abuses of Columbus originate from? Where is the proof of his evilness?
This same story is still being told today starting in elementary school only it has become with a little more emphasis on the evilness.
Last year I had a conversation with a young man of 11 years about his schooling, his favorite subjects, the usual probes to initiate conversation from a 6th grader. He’s a pretty bright boy and schooling comes easy to him; he is very inquisitive, and he expresses himself above the average. The topic of history came up, one of his favorite subjects. Christopher Columbus came up somehow and we discussed a little about the travels and discoveries of this explorer. He reiterated the brief history lesson of his class, even the defacing of the Columbus statues in various states. I asked him how he felt about that, in which he replied, “Columbus was an evil man who did evil things.” I was quite taken back. “Why do you believe that?” I asked.
He explained how Columbus, pillaged, abused the natives, and used them as slaves. “The teacher says there is proof.” This is what is being taught in the public school he attends. Wow…
This is my grandson.
Well, I didn’t have a full answer to his revelations. While the story of Christopher was that he kind of found America by accident, and that he did bring disease to the Indian tribes, this “evil man” theory was obviously not the history taught to most of us in 6th grade. So, this was something that I couldn’t let go. I started to do some research as to where this revelation of “evil Columbus” originated from. Names like Hans Koning (Columbus: His Enterprise: Exploding the Myth), and Howard Zinn (A People’s History of the United States) came up. This began my mini probe into Mr. Zinn and his philosophy and political beliefs, one of the sources of this history revisionist stories of Columbus. A sources of my critique of Mr. Zinn, who does hold the view of an “evil Columbus” is in a book by Mary Grabar (Debunking Howard Zinn – Exposing the Fake History that Turned a Generation against America, by Mary Grabar, Regnery History 2019, chapt 1)
I won’t go into what my findings are on Howard Zinn, nor I’m I saying Mr. Zinn is an “evil person” himself, only that he distorts the history of the leader of the Santa Maria, the Nina, and Pinta. Mr. Zinn has every right to express whatever ideas and philosophy he wants. I only I needed to have a response to my grandson that wasn’t as bias as his original lesson on Columbus. He needed to hear some rational opposing viewpoints. Here’s a lecture that Ms. Grabar gave at a 2022 Columbus Day event.
I found plenty of Christopher bashing video’s on YouTube that repeated the same derogatory remarks, but I did manage to find this one that at least attempted to be objective.
It’s easy to take passed events and filter them through contemporary standards. If we’re honest current standards are not all that civilized at all (Abortions, gender LGQBxyz, sex trafficking). The 20th century is one of the most violent.
All I’m after is the truth, wherever that leads.
Midterm Elections 2022
President Biden a self proclaimed Catholic is doubling down on his support for abortion.
He, along with Nancy Pelosi, also self proclaimed Catholic have plans after the Midterm elections. Should they retain the House and Senate, they will go to work on passing a law to nationally support abortion, up to birth despite the Supreme Courts ruling to overturn Wade v. Roe. This decision does not prohibit abortion as the media would have you believe, but simply returning to the states the decision on this matter.
Here in California, we have Proposition 1 on the ballot, which is an attempt to write abortion into the states constitution. Late-term abortions at tax payer expend at any time. This state will be a baby killing state.
Absolutely appalling.
Please, fellow Catholics we have many issues that we are faced with this election cycle. Inflation, Crime, Immigration all of which I myself will be addressing to correct on my ballot. But please don't forget the unborn, our future and hope.
So, my blog page has not been updated for awhile…my fault for not posting on a regular basis.
But I’m still here!!!!
Therefore, it’s probably a good time to start anew.
I’ll lead off with an earth-shaking announcement on the Dobb’s case that overturns the Roe vs Wade decision of abortion as the “law of the land.” Frankly, I didn’t think I would be here to see this day, though I knew the Truth would eventually be known that the 1973 law was bogus.
And yes, even Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed that it was overreaching. While the “man behind the curtain”, “the elephant in the room” whatever you want to call it has been exposed, it appears the ruling has been distorted. Why can’t it be expressed truthfully?
I have some thoughts.
1.The forces that want abortion on demand can’t come to the realization that the Roe law was not founded on legit arguments. Abortion is not in the constitution or the 14th amendment. It was basically the Justices at the time creating a law. As we all know the Congress is the only branch that creates laws. The Supreme Court only interprets the law. The proponents of abortion want to cloak this new decision in as dark a matter as they can. Regardless of what the pro-abortion news pundits or government officials say (more on the political aspect later).
It’s not taking away abortion. It’s placing the decision in the hands of the State and therefore the citizens. It’s not the beginning of turning over same-sex-marriage or any other newly minted controversial laws. Women won’t have to go to dark ally secret non-safe abortion houses.
The Dobb’s decision only says that abortion laws are in the hands of the States. Citizens vote on their state representatives those who they want to make these decisions. NOT the government.
2.I think this fueling of outrage is a sign of desperation on the part of politicians, specifically the Democrat party, who sense a major mid-term defeat in the Fall. They want to highlight an issue that will distract from the issues of inflation, high gas prices, high crime, the immigration chaos, the Afghanistan pull-out catastrophe. The D-party needs a cause to counter these issues and lead the voters on a false understanding of the supreme court decision. The rhetoric from these politicians is mind boggling. The voting down of proposed laws and upholding of existing laws that protect the Justices from harassment at their homes is foreboding and is an example of events we see only in places like China (Hong Kong), tyrannical countries, and governments. The elimination of the opposition.
The pro-life movement can count this as a success, but the fight is not over. Continued vigilance of potential hate acts as a product of this decision and the inciting of violence on churches and organizations that support pro-life issues is something we as supporters of the unborn will have to remain vigilant to. Continued prayers and support, especially for mothers who need help with their unborn and born babies. Their need for medical care and living conditions, education in baby, childcare. We need to be ready to offer help where it’s needed to support life, prior to birth and after birth.
Catholics must "NEVER vote for candidates"who support abortion....NEVER
Bishop Chad Zielinski of Fairbanks, Alaska voices Catholic teaching, what more church leader should be doing.
This is a crucial election, as all elections are. This one even more so considering the presidential candidates views on the unborn children. The 'seamless garment' theory that, all election topics are of equal value is NOT church teaching. Abortion is an intrinsic evil, as stated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church 2270-2275.
We must protect the innocent lives of the unborn, we must start there if we are ever going to legitimately address the protection of ALL.
If you haven't seen this video yet, you've got to. Father Altmanpreaches it without fear. Those
that say, "he's stepping over into politics, he's crossing the line!" is not taking into account the real message of Fr. Altman, that our Faith SHOULD NOT TAKE A BACK SEAT to selecting our government officials, including the presidency.
We, as Catholics must live the teachings of Christ, NO MATTER WHAT!. Whether that means not getting free checks from the government or free anything, at the expense of the unborn.
When one drives a car, one stops at all the traffic lights, not just the ones that we want to. We we go into surgery at a hospital we expect the doctors to follow all the steps of the procedure, not just some of them. When we order food from a restaurant we expect that our order is not some missing anything and is complete. If I order a burger, the patty shouldn't be missing.
When we talk about being a Catholic, that means we follow ALL THE TEACHINGS OF OUR FAITH, all the teaching of the Catholic church. To do otherwise is not a true follower of Christ's church. One is not in communion with the church and it's truths. To do otherwise is not Catholicism but a separate church one has created on their own. That is what Fr. Altman 's message is.
A politician who claims to be Catholic and still supports and promotes Abortion, is not following the teaching of the Catholic church. A political party that promotes abortion at any stage as their political platform, not a party that a Catholic should support.
Though Donald Trump is not a Catholic, he does come closest, as a candidate for the presidency to supporting our Catholic teachings. I don't promote his character, not everything that he says I agree with. I'm not necessarily saying he is an example of an exemplary role model. What I am saying is his actions align themselves closest to our Catholic teachings.
I sort of think of him as a King Cyrus of the Old Testament. He ruled over the captive Jewish people, but allowed them to rebuild their temple and practice their faith. I think of him as as a Constantine of the middle ages, allowing the Catholic faith to be practiced without persecution. Cyrus and Constantine are key people in history that helped protect the faith, not perfect people themselves.
We need more priest like Fr. Altman not afraid to speak the truth. Not afraid to upset the anyone and thus have a lighter collection basket.
Let's all pray for our elections, that we may be a Holy Nation with Virtuous people, lead by the teaching of Jesus Christ. Let's pray for our priest and church leaders to be more vocal. Let's pray that we may not be silent about our faith.
So the DNC has completed their case and the RNC is in their final day. I only listened in sporadically to both of their list of speakers and the internet is a blaze with clips and commentary on the highlights.
As a Catholic, my ear was attentive to the message the speakers made to see if they aligned with the teachings of the Catholic Church. Catechism handy and a number of books and Catholic links to reference, there was a lot to digest.
Especially when you get to witness two Catholic nuns, one of each who spoke at one or the other conventions.
First up you had Sister Simone Campbell at the DNC. Wikipediahas an entry: Simone Campbell, SSS, is an American Roman Catholic Religious
Sister, lawyer, lobbyist and executive director of NETWORK. She belongs
to the Sisters of Social Service. She is known as an outspoken advocate
for social justice.
she is a lawyer, lobbyist, social service activist. Here's her presentation at the DNC.
Sister Deirdre “Dede” Byrne at the RNC gave her speech yesterday, 8/26. The National Catholic Register has a nice piece on her.
She served in the U.S. Army Medical Corps, in active duty in Afghanistan
and later as a reservist, eventually rising to the rank of colonel. She
served for 13 months in Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula. As a missionary
surgeon, she devoted herself to helping the sick in Kenya, Haiti, Sudan
and Iraq. - NCR
Sister Simone describes herself as an advocate for the environment, the fighter against poverty, workplace protections for mothers and immigration. All that is fine. To me these are all issues which I agree with. I may differ from her on her views on how to implement them. Medicare for all, no fossil fuels, open borders are not my answers to these issues as she views them, but we can have an open conversation on them.
One topic that I don't agree with her on is on the topic of the unborn. she has called pro-lifers, pro-birthers which shows her tendency to support abortion. she diverts the direct question on abortion to say that folks that support laws to stop abortion don't follow through with laws addressing the child after birth. Her prayer to the divine spirit also caught me off guard. Seemed a little New Age to me.
Here's an article that she wrotearound the 2008 elections. I don't see a firm voice from her condemning abortion as the teachings of the Catholic Church do. Plus this party has a platform of 'Abortion on demand.'..up to birth. I have a major problem with that. Definitely NOT Catholic teaching.
Sister Deirdre as a surgeon on the other hand, came right out and said it during her RNC presentation, "life begins at conception." There was no diversion or side stepping on the issue.
I'm still reading up on both Sisters and I don't doubt their faith as Catholics, but what I've learned, one can call themselves Catholics and don't follow church teaching. Both have dedicated their lives to serving others and both are highly educated. I don't know, I like a Sister in a habit, not one that looks like my grandma. To me that shows an outward dedication to let all around you know, who they serve first.
Gov. Cuomo said in one of his appearances on CNN last week, "...we stopped the virus, not God". Well, I could go on about the governor, but I won't bore you. I don't know why a self proclaimed Christian (Catholic) would say such a thing has me baffled. Anyway that's not the purpose of this point. Bishop Barron responds to Cuomo's statement...not what you think. It's very good and worth a listen... Bishop Barron
Sunday, April 12, 2020
Christ has Risen! Blessed Easter to everyone. - WCC
might past it on for your enjoyment. I haven't read any of his books, Confessions, or City of God. They're on my list and having seen this documentary, they have moved up on my list of must reads.
Father Spitzer, S.J., Ph.D of the Magis Center in Orange County California, is one of my favorite go-to for his contributions to understanding the Transcendental aspects of our Catholic faith. His website crediblecatholic.com is an invaluable resource for the scientific proofs of God. In his commencement speech to the 2019 class at Christendom College in California, give some very sound advise to the graduates as they enter the life/work culture. Indeed his advise sound for everyone to read. Three Sane Decisionsto Help you Save your Soul is the title of his talk. A more detailed discussion can be found in his book Finding True Happiness.
This is interesting, in a sad way. Former Fr. Jonathan Morris,
ex-commentator and now ex-Catholic priest is interviewed by Martha MacCallum.
He explains his recent decision to be laicized. He's
explanation is that he never intended to become a priest and after 25
years from Seminary to priesthood, he had to take action to actually
follow God's real plan for him as he now felt in his own heart and gut
Wow....
Well I definitely don't know his heart and I do applaud his
continued acknowledgement of his faith
in the Catholic Church, I can't say I understand. Many of the Saints,
including Mother Theresa had experiences that made them doubt their
vocations, even experiences of the dark soul. Even those who have been
married for quite some time have experienced at one point or another,
that maybe they may have married the wrong person or wanted out of their
relationship because of some hard-time, financial or otherwise, so I
don't know if Mr. Morris will have the fortitude to weather those
moments either.
I believe he is a priest, forever as it says in Hebrews 7:17
For it is declared: "You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek."
Very recently, Pope Francis gave his blessing to the French Church revising their translation to change from, "and lead us not into temptation" to "don't let me fall into temptation.” Jimmy Akin from Catholic Answers give his take the media hipe on this Here. I first saw the Headlines on the Drudge Report but it was widely reported throughout the media, like (Photo:Time.com) FoxNews and USA Today to name just a couple. Few outlets couldn't pass up the chance to weigh in. Maybe with a motive of, if the pope can change the Catholic Church on this topic why not others...I'm only speculating. Few offered no substance or factual reasoning or how it truly affects everyday Catholics, if fact it only caused confusing. Patrick Madrid on his daily morning show on Relevant Radio offered some keen insight.
He had a quick wit about him and a full servant of our Lord Jesus Christ and His
Church. In the interview he pointed out various concerns with the leadership of
the Church presently, the same concerns that I and many of us as lay Catholics
have.
As I always do when I find someone I find interesting or a
book that catches my eye, is I go on a bit of an investigation, finding out as
much as I can about that person or author, or subject matter before I purchase
a book they’ve written or pursue any other articles or video’s they appear in
or write.
The National Catholic Reporter also has an article about him
and they didn’t like him too much, which is one in the PLUS + column for John
as far as I’m concerned.
So, I looked up a number of his books at Barnes and Noble, because
they’re my local bookstore whom I like to support. Amazon has him as well.
I liked the titles in the book’s table of contents.
·The Church and what it says about itself and the
world, and what will happen to you when you die.
·The Pope, the Bishops and When and why Catholics
have to believe What they say – And When and Why we Don’t.
·How Birth Control Tore the Church apart.
…just to name a few.
Here’s an article from National Catholic Register that takes a more thorough look
at the author and this particular book. I agree with their take and I look
forward to reading John’s book.
Visited briefly, Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Church yesterday after this was pointed out to me at yesterday. Statue of Mary and another of a Saint was decapitated. ...terrible.
All done in the dead of night anonymously. If you want to make a statement, hey tell us how you are and take full credit. Coward!
The call is for excommunication of Governor Cuomo is blasting loud and clear from Catholics across the nation. It sounds good to me, here is an individual among many that claim the Catholic identity, however his actions give the lay Catholic and non-Catholic alike the obvious examples of something totally opposite. Some don't even know he is already banned from receiving Holy Communion, so what good would it do? Many Catholic blogs/podcasts bugle the same call for excommunication and
some try to engage in a rather superficial, emotional call to light the
torches and storm Frankenstein's castle. How many Catholics really know the, What, How, Why of excommunication? Rather than just join the band wagon, we should educate ourselves on the subject matter, terminology definitions, purpose and expectations.
Edward Peters a well know Canon Lawyer has an excellent blog (In the Light of the Law, a Canon Lawyer's blog) one should visit regularly to help with that education. Yes, some of it my be a little hard to understand but canon law is not a simple matter and excommunication is not a simple declaration. Here's one of a few resent pieces on this subject that will be a helpful place to start.
The new Abortion law of NY has risen the Life issue to another level.
It's no longer considered a discussion or debate but a right to kill a
child ... at birth. The cry is to excommunicate the NY Mayor. So why hasn't the Cardinal Dolan or Bishop Scharfenberger done so? The Bishop of Albany voices his thoughts on EWTN.
You would have to be living under a rock to not know of the Border issue played daily on the local and cable news outlets. Every newspaper, and political magazine has it covered and even the late night shows have to add their two cents to up their ratings. The one thing that is missing is the facts and an honest discussion. In fact an honest discussion and real facts on the subject are the last thing portrayed. We need to educate ourselves and learn the facts for ourselves because its getting harder and harder to believe anything. We hear from our priest, bishops and even the Pope as interpreted by the media, which is often twisted to conform to a particular bias. Case in point, I did an quick internet search: "Catechism of the Catholic Church, Immigration". It came up with reference to the US Catholic Bishops websites.
¶1911: Internal quote is from Gaudium et Spes: “The unity of the
human family, embracing people who enjoy equal natural dignity, implies a
universal common good. This good calls for an organization of the
community of nations able to provide ‘for men’s different needs, both in
the fields of social life—such as food supplies, health, education,
labor and also in certain special circumstances which can crop up here
and there, e.g., the need to promote the general improvement of
developing countries, or to alleviate the distressing conditions in
which refugees dispersed throughout the world find themselves, or also
to assist migrants and their families. to alleviate the distressing
conditions in which refugees dispersed throughout the world find
themselves, or also to assist migrants and their families.’” ¶2211:
“The political community has a duty to honor the family, to assist it,
and to ensure especially… the right to private property, to free
enterprise, to obtain work and housing, and the right to emigrate.” ¶2241:
“The more prosperous nations are obliged, to the extend they are able,
to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and means of
livelihood which he cannot find in his country of origin. Public
authorities should see to it that the natural right is respected that
places a guest under the protection of those who receive him.”
Political authorities, for the sake of the common good for which
they are responsible, may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject
to various juridical conditions, especially with regard to the immigrants'
duties toward their country of adoption. Immigrants are obliged to respect
with gratitude the material and spiritual heritage of the country that receives
them, to obey its laws and to assist in carrying civic burdens.
--> ¶2433:
“Access to employment and to professions must be hope to all without
unjust discrimination; men and women, healthy and disabled, natives and
immigrants. For its part society should, according to circumstances,
help citizens find work and employment.” Catholic teaching except it leaves out pertinent
paragraphs, see the text in Red.
-->
Where do we go, who do we listen to? Not all our priest and bishops are wrong, often we hear partial truths and facts. We need to continue to read the churches teaching through encyclicals good Catholic resources, and our good and faithful priestsand Bishops
Pray for peace and a fuller understanding on this issue
I just finished a Philosophy 5 college course this passed semester. I
kind of knew the academic world was biased against religion and as I expected, I ended up confronting (respectfully) the professor who is a professed Catholic, Agnostic, Eastern
religious guru follower and sometimes Atheist in his writings on many occasions in class during the semester. All of
these like the heads of a Hydra, you never knew which you were facing when
you attended class. The Professor and I butted heads on the second day
of class on the topic of Galileo religion vs science...NOT!) and believe it or not that kind of
created a sort of relationship of mutual respect throughout
the rest of the class. His bias was of the Scientism perspective and
being maybe four or five years younger than the professor, I tried to
bring a little balance and counter for the benefit of the youngin's in
the class They seemed to want to swallow whatever the instructor feed them. For those of faith, the academic environment can bring doubt and cause
one to really question our beliefs. But that shouldn't be so. We should
enter these classes and well the world with a sense of confidence in our faith.
Philosopher Peter Kreeftis an anchor in revealing the beauty and truth of the
Catholic faith and his new book, Forty Reasons I am Catholic seems like a timely one. I'm ordering
mine...you should pick one up for yourselves as well. STAY STRONG AND CONFIDENT IN YOUR FAITH, THE LORD JESUS CHRIST